Replacement Arthroplasty (Subscribe)
Categories
- Elbow Replacement Arthroplasty (1)
- Internet resources relating to Total Elbow Replacement arthroplasty
- Finger Replacement Arthroplasty (0)
- Internet resources relating to Finger Replacement Arthroplasty
- Hip Replacement Arthroplasty (46)
- Internet resources relating to Hip Replacement Arthroplasty
- Knee Replacement Arthroplasty (32)
- Internet resources relating to Knee Replacement Arthroplasty
- Shoulder Replacement (2)
- Internet resources relating to shoulder replacement arthroplasty (total) and hemi-arthroplasty
Links
AAOS 1999 Symposium G Polyethylene- The Past Present and Future
http://web.archive.org/web/20040418015036/http://www.aaos.org:80/wordh ...Anticoagulants May Increase Mortality After Hip and Knee Surgery Medscape
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/572419Clinical Pathways Joint Prosthesis
http://www.aapmr.org/hpl/clinclpath/jointa.htmEnhanced Instrumentation for Removal of a Bone Plug
http://www.aboutjoints.com/physicianinfo/topics/boneplugknee/boneplug. ...Extensible endoprosthesis of the humerus after resection of bone tumours
http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/reprint/81-B/3/495.pdfFactors influencing wider acceptance of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) Technologies for Total Joint Arthroplasty
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/match/Publications/MATCH_CAOS_Review_Decem ...Immune Response to Implants eMedicine Orthopedics
http://www.emedicine.com/orthoped/topic615.htmMetal hypersensitivity is commonly reported in the literature and can include hypersensitivity related to pacemakers, dental implants, and orthopedic hardware. The development of metal sensitivity after implantation of orthopedic hardware is common.
The clinical significance of metal sensitization remains a question. Nonetheless, the orthopedic surgeon must be aware of the potential problem, and when other more common causes of implant failure have been excluded, the possibility of allergic reaction to the metal must be considered, evaluated, and treated.
Synonyms and related keywords: pacemaker, dental implant, orthopedic implant, implanted orthopedic device, allergic reaction, nickel hypersensitivity, chromium sensitivity, cobalt sensitivity, migration inhibition factor, MIF, lymphocyte transformation testing, LTT proliferation testing, metal hypersensitivity implant hypersensitivity
Implant Wear In Total Joint Replacement
http://web.archive.org/web/20020605163356/http://www3.aaos.org/implant ...Implant Wear in Total Joint Replacement: Clinical and Biologic Issues, Material and Design Considerations Edited by Timothy M. Wright, PhD and Stuart B. Goodman, MD, PhD A symposium held in October 2000 Table of Contents Clinical Issues Chapter 1 What is the clinical scope of implant wear in the hip and how has it changed since 1995? Chapter 2 What is the clinical scope of implant wear in the knee and how has it changed since 1995? Chapter 3 What patient-related factors contribute to implant wear? Chapter 4 What surgical-related factors contribute to implant wear? Chapter 5 How should wear-related implant surveillance be carried out and what methods are indicated to diagnose wear-related problems? Chapter 6 What are the systemic consequences of wear debris clinically? Chapter 7 What guidelines/algorithms (both operative and nonoperative) are there for the treatment of osteolysis? Chapter 8 What are the best outcome measures for wear? Chapter 9 What is the outcome of the treatment of osteolysis? Biologic Issues Chapter 10 What are the local and systemic biologic reactions to wear debris? Chapter 11 What are the mediators (cellular, molecular, etc) of the local and systemic biologic reactions to wear debris? Chapter 12 Are there host factors that determine/modulate the biologic response to wear particles? Chapter 13 What specific features of wear particles are most important in determining the adverse biologic reactions? Chapter 14 What is the role of endotoxin and fluid pressure in osteolysis? Chapter 15 What experimental approaches (tissue retrieval, in vivo, in vitro, etc) have been used to investigate the biologic effects of particles? Chapter 16 Are there biologic markers of wear? Chapter 17 What potential biologic treatments are there for osteolysis? Material and Design Considerations Chapter 18 What design and material factors influence wear in total joint replacement? Chapter 19 What is the role of wear testing and joint simulator studies in discriminating among materials and designs? Chapter 20 What design factors influence wear behavior in total knee replacement? Chapter 21 What design factors influence wear behavior at the articulating surfaces in total hip replacement? Chapter 22 What are the wear mechanisms and what controls them? Chapter 23 What material properties and manufacturing procedures influence wear mechanisms? Chapter 24 What modifications can be made to materials to improve wear behavior? Chapter 25 What evidence is there for using alternative bearing materials?
Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for diaphyseal bone tumours
http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/abstract/88-B/11/1487Custom-made intercalary endoprostheses may be used for the reconstruction of diaphyseal defects following the resection of bone tumours. The aim of this study was to determine the survival of intercalary endoprostheses with a lap joint design, and to evaluate the clinical results, complications and functional outcome. We retrospectively reviewed six consecutive patients, three of whom underwent limb salvage with intercalary endoprostheses of the tibia, two of the femur, and one of the humerus. Their mean age was 42 years (28 to 64). The mean follow-up was 21.6 months (9 to 58). The humeral prosthesis required revision at 14 months owing to aseptic loosening. There were no implant-related failures. Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional outcome scores indicated that patients achieved 90% of premorbid function. Custom intercalary endoprostheses result in reconstructions comparable with, if not better than, those of allografts. Using this design of implant reduces the incidence of early complications and difficulties experienced with previous versions.
OsteoBridge modular disaphyseal prosthesis
http://www.globalortho.com.au/content/view/227/449/Oswestry Outcome Centre
http://www.outcomecentre.com/Outcome and Functional Results of Diaphyseal Endoprosthesis after Tumour Excision
http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/reprint/78-B/4/652.pdfPolyethylene and Polyethylene Wear Wheeless
http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/polyethylene_and_polyethylene_wear ...- impact strength of UHMWPE is higher than that for HDPE and the density of UHMWPE is much lower than for HDPE;
- UHMWPE has better abrasion resistance, strength, resistance to deformation, and fatigue strength
Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics
Prioritisation of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee arthroplasties and cataract surgery
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/76/abstractPrioritisation instruments were developed for patients on waiting list for hip and knee arthroplasties (AI) and cataract surgery (CI). The aim of the study was to assess their convergent and discriminant validity and inter-observer reliability.



